Rental vs ownership

[BlueByYou]

Are you more inclined to rent a telehandler or do you prefer to own one? What’s your reasoning behind that choice?

 

[Bluesteeltech]

I’d go with renting unless it’s used regularly, saves on maintenance and storage while keeping access to newer models.

 

[Blueironman]

I generally prefer to rent because it’s less expensive to take care of and I only need it a couple of times a year. But if I were using it on a weekly basis, I’d buy it in a heartbeat.

 

[Chocoltm!lk]

think about the utilization rate. if that machine isn't moving at least 60-70% of the month, you’re just paying for a high end lawn ornament
renting keeps your capital liquid and lets the rental yard deal with the headaches of 1000hr services and hydraulic leaks

 

[Bluehydrau]

I started by renting one thinking I’d just dip my toes in. But I ended up using it so much that buying one would have been more cost-effective in the long run. Rentals are great for those one-off jobs, but nothing compares to the convenience of having your own machine right at your fingertips.

 

[Hayhunt]

Having a telehandler has been a game changer for my small construction projects. I use it nearly every day so renting would be a hassle. Plus owning one means I know its history and can customize the attachments just the way I like.